In the case of Hendrick Hudson Bd of Ed vs Rowley, what was the basis of the parents' argument?

The foundation of the parents' argument in the case of Hendrick Hudson Bd of Ed vs Rowley centered around the belief that the provision of a sign language interpreter would significantly enhance their child's educational experience and performance. They contended that for their daughter, who was deaf, having access to a qualified interpreter would facilitate better communication, thereby allowing her to fully participate in classroom activities and access the curriculum. This highlight on the importance of effective communication aligns with the broader principles of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which emphasizes providing support that is necessary for students with disabilities to achieve meaningful educational progress.

In this specific case, the court ultimately ruled that while the school had not provided an interpreter, it had still offered an appropriate level of education that met the requirements of IDEA, thereby underscoring that the combination of specialized services could still lead to satisfactory educational outcomes even without the specific interpreters sought by the parents.